Skip to main content

Bringing Out The Dead (1999)


Martin Scorsese – Bringing Out The Dead (1999)

New York. Lights. Neon lights. Flashing ads. Skyscrapers. Blocks, some better, some worse. An ambulance. Wet asphalt reflecting the neon glow and Van Morrison’s T.B. Sheets…

    “The night started out with a bang! A gunshot to the chest. Drug deal gone bad.”

Paul Schrader is once again in his element as screenwriter in Bringing Out the Dead, based on Joe Connelly’s novel and directed by Martin Scorsese. The film is a depiction of the often hellish everyday life of paramedics, and what it takes to endure it. Joe Connelly, who wrote the book, spent nine years working in the EMS in New York’s Hell’s Kitchen. Both Scorsese and Cage spent time on actual paramedic calls in NYC as part of their preparation for the film.

Nicolas Cage’s character, Frank, has problems—or rather, they all do (the paramedics). Frank is haunted by inner ghosts, former patients—especially the ones who didn’t make it—who begin to manifest in his daily life. They appear on street corners or beside lamp posts, wherever they feel like positioning themselves. Frank tries to come to terms with them, make some kind of internal reckoning, or maybe he simply carries the guilt of their deaths. In his fragile state, Frank sometimes talks to the dead. His eyes dark from exhaustion, his mind fraying at the edges.

Above all, Bringing Out the Dead is a showcase for its cast—an ensemble piece, even if Cage carries the lead role with stylish intensity. Tom (Tom Sizemore) seems like he’s been helping himself to more than just aspirin from the med bag. Larry (John Goodman) goes with the flow and doesn’t stress—except, maybe, about his Chicken Lo Mein. Marcus, played by Ving Rhames, is a paramedic-slash-preacher who prays loudly in the name of the Lord, promising to bring overdose victims back from the dead—while Frank quietly slips Narcan into the patient’s vein. Patricia Arquette plays ex-junkie Mary, whose father Frank desperately tries to save.

Cinematographer Robert Richardson once again delivers a strong and visually compelling film. Known for his work on Platoon, Natural Born Killers, and Casino, and later on with Tarantino, Richardson’s visuals fit the film’s tone perfectly. Scorsese’s long-time editor Thelma Schoonmaker adds a sense of chaos and sharp rhythm, just what a film like this needs.

Of course, the film leans into the darker side of life and the raw, brutal reality of urban existence. But what stands out is its relentless, deadpan black humor, woven in here and there. New York appears at times almost magical, glowing in neon and reflections—and at other times like a version of hell on earth, full of drunks, addicts, madmen, and violence. The same can be said of the hospital ERs: when they’re full, they’re full.

Despite all this, the film isn’t entirely nihilistic or hopeless. Frank’s voiceover reflects, questions, evaluates—both himself and the world around him. One could view the film through a sociopolitical lens, but Scorsese never underlines the message too heavily. Still, it’s clear: not everything is in great shape. In Dog We Trust!

    “I’m sick, Tom! I need a care. Vitamin B-cocktail, ampoule of glucose and a drop of adrenaline. Not as good as beer! But it’s all I got!”

In many ways, Bringing Out the Dead is a successful piece of work—and for me, it’s nowhere near the bottom of Scorsese’s filmography. Although Joe Connelly’s novel was a bestseller in the U.S., the film itself didn’t manage to make much impact commercially. A shame.

Bringing Out the Dead is chaotic, erratic, and fierce. It shows what it needs to show, but with intriguing casting and shifts in tone, it becomes a surprisingly well-balanced and compelling film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

  Thelma (2017), dir. Joachim Trier The Norwegian film Thelma , directed by Joachim Trier and co-written with Eskil Vogt, is nearly flawless in every aspect. It succeeds where many others in its genre falter. First and foremost, the film plunges into the subconscious with such force that I found myself reaching for a few volumes of Jung from my bookshelf. Thelma (Eili Harboe) moves away from her parents’ home in a small town to study biology in Oslo. She befriends a few fellow students, but one in particular, Anja (Kaya Wilkins), catches her attention. As Thelma begins experiencing epileptic seizures and ominous black birds hurl themselves at windows, things take a strange and gripping turn. When the friendship between the girls becomes something deeper, Thelma’s rigid Christian upbringing can’t handle it without resistance. Although the film’s thematic thread is fairly clear—essentially a coming-of-age story—Trier layers it with family drama, tragedy, and the paranormal. One ca...
Anna Eriksson  E                                  In Tarkovsky’s The Sacrifice of Time , Tarkovsky recalls Ovid and Engels: “Ovid wrote that art lies in not being noticed” and “Engels emphasized that the better the creator’s vision is hidden, the better for the work of art.” Anna Eriksson’s film E is brilliantly lingering and unflinchingly bold, even witty. In her films, Eriksson relies on strong visuality, the subconscious, and the inexhaustible flow of associations. In her latest film E , Eva Volger (Anna Eriksson), as the Prime Minister of Finland, performs an anasyrma at a Nobel ceremony. In ancient Greece, an anasyrma was seen as a symbolic gesture conveying power and shock—one that exposes, unsettles, and forces the audience to confront a reality that the spectacle seeks to conceal. Next, we see Eva Volger wandering in the desert. Soon, her answering machine is flooded with messages. Thes...
Krzysztof Kieslowski’s Blue – The Multidimensionality of Loss and the Inner World    A family drives down the highway. A child watches the lights reflecting in the rear window. A dirt road, mist. A boy tosses a kendama by the roadside. Suddenly — a crash. What is loss? It is final.  In this essay, I examine Blue , the first film in Polish director Krzysztof Kieslowski’s Three Colors trilogy. I focus on the film’s thematic core: loss and the violently shifting emotional landscapes it creates—those places where words fail, collapse, and disintegrate. I also reflect on the film’s rhythm and visual language as part of a broader thematic whole. In addition, I reference certain key elements that contribute significantly to the film’s structure and meaning. In the opening scenes of Blue , Kieslowski employs a deliberately fragmentary visual style: labored breathing, blurred focus, and extreme close-ups—of a hand, of an eye reflecting the doctor’s face. This fragmentation mi...